Philosophy Essay On Cultural Relativism

Ethical Relativism And Cultural Relativism Essay

In explaining Cultural Relativism, it is useful to compare and contrast it with Ethical Relativism. Cultural Relativism is a theory about morality focused on the concept that matters of custom and ethics are not universal in nature but rather are culture specific. Each culture evolves its own unique moral code, separate and apart from any other. Ethical Relativism is also a theory of morality with a view of ethics similarly engaged in understanding how morality comes to be culturally defined. However, the formulation is quite different in that from a wide range of human habits, individual opinions drive the culture toward distinguishing normal “good” habits from abnormal “bad” habits. The takeaway is that both theories share the guiding principle that morality is bounded by culture or society.

Implicit in the basic formulations for both theories, the moral code of a culture is neither superior nor inferior to any another. The codes of individual cultures are just different and there is no standard or basis upon which to perform any type of comparison. Therefore, under both theories, the lack of standards across cultures implies that attempts to judge relative correctness or incorrectness between them cannot be justified.

For Cultural Relativism, it is perfectly normal that something one culture sees as moral, another may see as immoral. There is no connection between them so they are never in conflict relative to their moral beliefs. However, within the context of Ethical Relativism there’s a significant difference. Normally, two cultures will possess varying proportions of the same normal and abnormal habits yet from a cross-cultural standpoint, what is abnormal in one culture can be seen as properly normal in another. There is no resulting conflict over consideration of what’s normal because they are just expressing a difference of opinion over the selection of a dominant good habit. These theories assure that the morality of two cultures must be viewed as strictly independent.

Within Cultural Relativism, a moral code exists in an evolved state, reflecting almost an absolute framework for it’s members, available for consultation as the need dictates. However, Ethical Relativism sets forth that opinions of what constitutes morally good habits will continuously vary within a culture and even tend toward growing more extreme over time. This static vs. dynamic element distinguishes between these two...

Loading: Checking Spelling


Read more

Cultural Relativism of Philosophy:-. Essay

1470 words - 6 pages Cultural Relativism and Human RightsCultures with their morals differ from each other across the world and with that indifference comes a conflict about which morals are right. James Rachels challenges the idea of cultural relativism. In this paper I review Benedicts...

Critical Analysis of Ethical Relativism

1376 words - 6 pages When it comes to moral dilemmas between cultures, there is a grey area that can sometimes make it difficult to resolve issues surrounding the dilemma. What is morality? How is it possible to know what is morally correct when cultures differ so vastly? To answer these questions, and many more regarding the moral dilemmas in the world, there are theories that have been developed to resolve them. One example is known as Ethical Relativism. Ethical...

What exactly is cultural relativism in metaethics? Is cultural relativism true? Can cultural relativists uphold the principle of cultural tolerance?

2125 words - 9 pages Metaethics is a branch of ethics that explores normative ethical questions concerning what it means be 'good'; the existence of objective and absolute values; the source of our values; and the nature of our moral judgments. Cultural relativism is a theory within the domains of metaethics which attempts to answer these questions, but in doing so raises its own...

Feminism and Cultural Relativism in Human Rights Discourse: Sex-determination Test in India

3130 words - 13 pages Feminism and Cultural Relativism in Human Rights Discourse: Sex-determination Test in India ABSTRACT: Feminists and cultural relativists are highly critical of human rights even if their criticisms have taken two diametrically opposed sides. This has created a conflict between the two groups. In this paper, I summarize the views of feminists and cultural relativists and then show that there are many similarities between them despite their...

Cultural Relativism vs. Ethnocentism - which is more objective?

1023 words - 4 pages To view one’s own culture as the universal by which all others are judged would be ultimately subjective, as our perceptions of cultural differences are shaped largely by our immersion in our own culture. An ethnocentric approach stems from judging an alternate culture in relation to one’s own pre-conceived cultural values, held to be superior; the parallax phenomenon, the inability to escape our own biases, prevents objective analysis of...

The Challenge of Cultural Relativism: The Elements of Moral Philosophy.

1590 words - 6 pages Consequentialism is a moral theory which is founded on the premise that an action is morally right if the outcomes of such actions maximize the good and minimize the bad. In contrast, Non-consequentialism is derived from the premise that some actions are inherently right or wrong. As these theories can derive either identical or varied conclusions in morally ambiguous situations, the conclusions in themselves, while important, can not be...

The Value of Cultural Relativism: Comparing Peace Corp Volunteer Floyd Sandford’s African Odyssey and Anthropologist Richard Lee’s Dobe Ju/’hoansi

1844 words - 7 pages Even a student that has been educated for only four weeks in anthropology can admit that their viewpoint has changed since acquiring their knowledge. Studying a foreign way of life and unfamiliar customs sheds light on the impact that one’s own culture has on their thoughts. Anthropology is valuable because has the ability to remove the shock and misunderstanding that occurs when examining an alien worldview. The value of cultural relativism,...

"What exactly is "cultural relativism" in metaethics? Is cultural relatisim true? Can cultural relativists uphold the principle of cultural tolerance?

2380 words - 10 pages Cultural relativism is one of many alternatives within the domain of metaethics, a theory relating to moral judgments and whether they are truth-apt (capable of being true or false). This theory is supported by Ruth Benedict as she argues that normality is relative to culture, to be morally "good" tantamount with normal, so therefore morality is relative to culture....

Understand the meaning of Anthropology, European colonialism, ethnocentrism and cultural relativism

710 words - 3 pages According to Keesing et al, Anthropology is described as the study of human beings relating to their physical and cultural behaviours. This is the term used to illustrate the time when European Anthropologists went out of Europe to the colonies in order to observe and describe the particularity of non European countries, attending to their traditional culture forms or their subjection to modern social change. For example, John Owen who was...

Conceptual Relativism and Radical Social Constructionism

1330 words - 5 pages Conceptual relativism is concerned with truth and knowledge and belongs specifically with the ability of the human mind to construct different realities, people have different versions of realities but there is no one reality as is the same with truth there is no one absolute truth there are only truths. (Lazar 1998)Many authors have described the nature of this in their own languages and this has bought about many different views of conceptual...

Absolutely Truthful Arguments - the difference between absolute truth and relativism

907 words - 4 pages "I have absolutely no right to be explaining philosophy," I declare.You exclaim, "Absolutely!"These above uses of 'absolutely' are a form of an intensity adverb and "emphatic agreement", respectively, and in society, the aforementioned uses would never be questioned because I have no background in philosophy, I have never taken a philosophy class, and all I know is that Plato's name is as notorious in college as play-dough is in...

Cultural relativism is a complex concept that has its intellectual roots in discussions about relativism in the philosophy of science and the philosophy of language. Relativism is typically viewed in contrast to realism, which is the idea that what is true and real exists independently of the mind. Where there are many different kinds of relativism-epistemological, moral, cultural, cognitive-they all have two features in common. First, they assert that one thing (e.g. moral values, knowledge, meaning) is relative to a particular framework (e.g. the individual subject, a culture, an era, or a language). Second, they deny that any standpoint is uniquely privileged over all others. While cultural relativism provides a reflexive and critical tool for sociology (and other social science disciplines), political and moral conservatives tend to despair over the influence of cultural relativism on intellectual thought and the shift away from objective, identifiable standards as the measure for all truth-claims. However, some researchers have argued that it is possible to adopt a cultural relativist stance without abandoning a commitment to the idea of universal standards or human rights.

Keywords Difference; Epistemology; Ethnocentric; Incommensurability; Objectivity; Positivism; Rationality; Realism; Relativism; Standpoint

Cultural Relativism


Cultural relativism is a complex concept that has its intellectual roots in discussions about relativism in the philosophy of science and the philosophy of language. The general concept of relativism in sociology is associated with critiques of positivism in science and concomitantly, social science, which largely emphasize the differences between the focus and methods of inquiry associated with the natural and social sciences. Relativism is typically viewed in contrast to realism, which is the idea that what is true and real exists independently of the mind. This opposition between realism and relativism was influenced by the work of Immanuel Kant in his (Critique of Pure Reason (1788), who argued that the material and social world is mediated through our minds: that people's experience of the world is mediated through the knowledge and ideas they hold about the world. Consequently, this relative epistemology-or cognitive relativism-makes it difficult to identify universal experiences that hold true for everyone, because it is likely that one person's experience of an event or activity will not be the same as that of another person. Cognitive relativism, then, refers broadly to an intellectual stance that rejects the idea of an absolute viewpoint and the existence of objective criteria for making judgments about what is or is not real or true.

Cultural relativism is associated with a general tolerance and respect for difference, which refers to the idea that cultural context is critical to an understanding of people's values, beliefs and practices. It is viewed as a progressive stance that a researcher can take to make sure that she does not privilege her own understanding of the world in her explanation of what is happening in the context she is studying-a stance that ensures her portrayal of a culture to which she does not belong is faithful to its internal understandings.

Where there are many different kinds of relativism-epistemological, moral, cultural, cognitive-they have two features in common:

• They assert that one thing (e.g. moral values, knowledge, meaning) is relative to a particular framework (e.g. the individual subject, a culture, an era, or a language).

• They deny that any standpoint is uniquely privileged over all others.

This latter feature of relativism has implications for how people develop and test knowledge about the social world (methodology) and how people make judgments about what kinds of social practices are better than others.

While cultural relativism is celebrated by postmodernists and poststructuralists, it is viewed negatively by moral conservatives, who see cultural relativism as the demise of moral obligation; the transformation of scientific endeavor into a random series of quixotic, subjective decisions and choices and the end of participation in civic affairs (Horowitz, 2004). The logic that sustains a commitment to cultural relativism is itself based on a claim that is relative to local (Western) criteria and begs the question: given the cultural differences in the world, how is it feasible to motivate compliance and implement ethical norms, such as human rights (Li, 2007)? Here, cultural relativism is seen to have an ethical dimension (moral relativism) that neutralizes people's ability to criticize the beliefs and practices of other cultures (Johnson, 2007).


The intellectual roots of cultural relativism within sociology lie in philosophical debates about distinctions between reality and relativism. Although the concept of realism has a complex history, it is generally accepted that it refers to the existence of a reality that lies beyond our thoughts or beliefs about it (Marshall et al., 1994). The main point of focus in debates about reality is whether universal truths or standards exist that we can use to measure or judge whether something is real (or true). This focus has had particular implications for philosophers and sociologists of science, who have studied the ways in which science makes claims about what exists, what is true and what counts as knowledge.

Philosophy of Science

Debates about cognitive relativism developed in the work of sociologists who engaged with the philosophy of science, which examines what science is, what makes it a special kind of knowledge and how scientists make claims that have authority and credibility. Science, it is assumed, occurs within a laboratory context that is free from bias, and which proceeds as a disinterested endeavor that creates a neutral product-such as explanations for differences between men and women. The aim of the scientific method is to produce knowledge that can be trusted, because it is based on empirical observation that can be repeated and tested by other researchers. This approach to knowledge production is known as positivism, which rejects knowledge based on belief, speculation or faith in favor of knowledge based on systematic observation and experiment that involves testing ideas against reality (i.e. what we see). Moreover, conventional accounts of science suggest that scientific knowledge grows cumulatively; each new discovery adding to what is already known.

However, sociologists have criticized this view of science and in particular, the role of objectivity and rationality (e.g. Feyerabend, 1993). For instance, Thomas Kuhn (1996) argued that the history of science was less linear than depicted because social beliefs and personal interests shape the practice and context of science. Moreover, researchers become attached to particular explanations and theoretical traditions associated with the scientific communities to which they belong, which influence whether new ideas are accepted or rejected. Thus, scientific exchange is not necessarily objective or rational and indeed, the criteria for deciding the merits of a scientific theory could be philosophical, or indeed political, as much as rational (Boudon, 2002). These associations and attachments undermine the potential for objectivity in science and for value-free inquiry. Kuhn suggests that the truth claims underpinning scientific theories are relative to the values and practices that shape scientific practice. Cognitive relativism suggests that there is no objective knowledge, only interpretations of what scientists observe and that no theory can be said to be 'true,' only probable (Boudon, 2002). Contemporary versions of these arguments assert that the objects of study within science are socially constructed and have no existence beyond the instruments that measure them and the minds that interpret them (Latour & Woolgar, 1979).

Philosophy of Language

Cultural relativism is linked to cognitive relativism through the claim that social science cannot identify truth, but only customs that vary from one society to another. While social scientists-such as anthropologists, geographers and sociologists-can observe and document such customs, explanations need to be grounded by reference to the contexts...

0 Replies to “Philosophy Essay On Cultural Relativism”

Lascia un Commento

L'indirizzo email non verrà pubblicato. I campi obbligatori sono contrassegnati *